WEBVTT

00:00:00.516 --> 00:00:04.546
[Music]

00:00:05.046 --> 00:00:06.366
My name is Nell Duke.

00:00:06.616 --> 00:00:08.756
I'm a professor at
Michigan State University,

00:00:08.996 --> 00:00:11.756
professor of teacher education
and educational psychology,

00:00:11.886 --> 00:00:14.576
and I also co-direct a research
center here called the Literacy

00:00:14.576 --> 00:00:15.496
Achievement Research Center.

00:00:15.756 --> 00:00:18.646
Teaching reading comprehension
strategies is so important K-3.

00:00:18.646 --> 00:00:20.466
In fact, it's the
one recommendation

00:00:20.466 --> 00:00:22.866
in our practice guide that
had the strongest evidence

00:00:22.866 --> 00:00:23.576
behind it.

00:00:23.826 --> 00:00:25.396
It's really clear from research

00:00:25.396 --> 00:00:27.786
that explicitly teaching
comprehension strategies

00:00:27.786 --> 00:00:31.016
to students does improve their
reading comprehension even

00:00:31.016 --> 00:00:32.606
in these very early
years of schooling.

00:00:32.796 --> 00:00:35.156
A large number of
studies have showed us

00:00:35.406 --> 00:00:37.736
that if we explicitly teach
and then give students lots

00:00:37.736 --> 00:00:40.176
of opportunities to practice
specific reading comprehension

00:00:40.176 --> 00:00:42.666
strategies, their reading
comprehension will improve

00:00:42.666 --> 00:00:45.546
and improve much more than
it would do just naturally.

00:00:46.156 --> 00:00:48.896
Some of these studies teach just
a single comprehension strategy,

00:00:48.896 --> 00:00:51.406
and even from teaching just
one comprehension strategy,

00:00:51.406 --> 00:00:53.526
we do see gains in students.

00:00:53.676 --> 00:00:56.596
Other of these studies will
have students learning several

00:00:56.596 --> 00:00:58.586
different strategies and
implementing those, and again,

00:00:58.736 --> 00:01:02.166
we see really, in some cases,
very substantial growth

00:01:02.236 --> 00:01:03.196
from the research studies

00:01:03.496 --> 00:01:05.245
in kids' reading
comprehension abilities even

00:01:05.245 --> 00:01:07.976
in the very early
years of schooling.

00:01:08.000 --> 00:01:11.700
[What is a comprehension
strategy?]

00:01:11.770 --> 00:01:14.296
A comprehension strategy is
something you do deliberately,

00:01:14.296 --> 00:01:16.446
intentionally to help
you build meaning.

00:01:16.576 --> 00:01:20.236
For example, with K-1, it's nice
to teach the phrase "I wonder."

00:01:20.466 --> 00:01:22.936
So we teach kids when
they're reading themselves

00:01:22.936 --> 00:01:24.806
or being read to, "I wonder.

00:01:25.076 --> 00:01:27.756
I wonder what the character
is going to do next.

00:01:27.756 --> 00:01:30.066
I wonder why the
character did that.

00:01:30.066 --> 00:01:32.966
I wonder why rainbows
come out when it rains."

00:01:33.246 --> 00:01:35.626
Those kinds of "I wonder"
statements are really a form

00:01:35.626 --> 00:01:38.916
of strategy--a strategy we
typically call self-questioning.

00:01:39.306 --> 00:01:41.896
But using the phrase "I
wonder" over and over again

00:01:41.896 --> 00:01:44.516
with little kids is a way
of getting them to the point

00:01:44.516 --> 00:01:46.816
where they can use a
strategy like self-questioning

00:01:46.816 --> 00:01:50.506
on their own even in their
earlier stages of development.

00:01:50.626 --> 00:01:52.946
There are a number of specific
comprehension strategies

00:01:52.946 --> 00:01:56.326
that we want students to develop
the use of in their reading.

00:01:56.636 --> 00:01:58.916
One is monitoring; this is
really a fundamental one,

00:01:58.916 --> 00:01:59.996
which is just paying attention

00:01:59.996 --> 00:02:01.946
to whether what you are
reading is making sense,

00:02:01.946 --> 00:02:04.126
and then when it isn't
making sense, doing something

00:02:04.126 --> 00:02:05.456
to clarify or to fix up.

00:02:05.456 --> 00:02:08.096
For example, rereading is
a great strategy to use

00:02:08.096 --> 00:02:09.906
when what you're reading
isn't making sense to you.

00:02:10.395 --> 00:02:12.326
Another important strategy
we want students to use,

00:02:12.326 --> 00:02:13.856
especially early on
in their reading,

00:02:14.016 --> 00:02:16.296
is to activate their relevant
background knowledge--What do

00:02:16.296 --> 00:02:17.976
they know related to
the text that they're

00:02:17.976 --> 00:02:21.046
about to read?--and then
to make predictions based

00:02:21.046 --> 00:02:22.396
on the background
knowledge that they have.

00:02:22.766 --> 00:02:25.176
We also want students to make
inferences, to make connections

00:02:25.176 --> 00:02:27.916
between different ideas in
the text and to sort of read

00:02:27.916 --> 00:02:29.966
between the lines of the
text that they're reading.

00:02:29.966 --> 00:02:32.586
We want students to
visualize as well,

00:02:32.586 --> 00:02:35.516
and very interestingly although
good adult readers visualize

00:02:35.516 --> 00:02:39.226
very easily, we find
that many young children

00:02:39.226 --> 00:02:41.396
and even some older struggling
readers don't visualize;

00:02:41.396 --> 00:02:43.986
they aren't picturing the
characters and the setting

00:02:44.036 --> 00:02:46.786
of the story, for example, or
they aren't picturing a process

00:02:46.826 --> 00:02:48.436
that they are reading about
in informational text.

00:02:48.746 --> 00:02:51.506
So we really want students to
be able to make those pictures,

00:02:51.506 --> 00:02:52.996
make those images
in their minds,

00:02:52.996 --> 00:02:55.346
see a movie in their minds of
what they're reading about.

00:02:55.936 --> 00:02:58.176
We like summarizing as
an important strategy

00:02:58.176 --> 00:03:01.226
to have students using, so
summarizing both sections

00:03:01.226 --> 00:03:04.036
of the text and then the
text as a whole as they read.

00:03:04.036 --> 00:03:04.966
That's an important one as well.

00:03:06.000 --> 00:03:09.046
[What does comprehension
strategy instruction look like?]

00:03:09.046 --> 00:03:11.176
I've had the privilege of
being in the classrooms

00:03:11.176 --> 00:03:12.216
of many teachers who are very,

00:03:12.216 --> 00:03:14.636
very strong at teaching reading
comprehension to children

00:03:14.636 --> 00:03:17.406
in K-3, and there are some
common threads that I see

00:03:17.406 --> 00:03:18.656
across those classrooms.

00:03:18.906 --> 00:03:20.366
One of the things that I see is

00:03:20.406 --> 00:03:21.586
that these teachers
are really good

00:03:21.586 --> 00:03:23.896
at setting a compelling
context for reading.

00:03:23.966 --> 00:03:26.146
So kids in those classrooms
aren't just reading

00:03:26.146 --> 00:03:28.146
because the teacher handed
them something to read;

00:03:28.366 --> 00:03:30.576
they're reading because they
are really engaged with,

00:03:30.616 --> 00:03:32.676
really interested in the
material they're reading.

00:03:32.926 --> 00:03:35.736
Maybe the teacher is having them
read about some topic in science

00:03:35.736 --> 00:03:37.756
so that they can teach
their buddy classroom

00:03:37.756 --> 00:03:39.026
about that topic.

00:03:39.026 --> 00:03:41.866
Or maybe teachers are
having students read stories

00:03:41.866 --> 00:03:44.106
because they are going to write
their own stories to contribute

00:03:44.106 --> 00:03:45.696
to the school library.

00:03:45.856 --> 00:03:48.206
They always have
this larger context,

00:03:48.206 --> 00:03:49.766
and the reason this
is important is

00:03:49.766 --> 00:03:51.576
because reading comprehension
is really hard work.

00:03:51.896 --> 00:03:53.586
There's a lot of
glucose burning up there,

00:03:53.586 --> 00:03:54.856
so to speak, when we're reading.

00:03:54.856 --> 00:03:57.886
It takes a lot of cognitive
energy to pay attention

00:03:57.886 --> 00:03:59.266
to whether what you're
reading is making sense

00:03:59.266 --> 00:04:01.476
and apply all these active
strategies and so on.

00:04:01.476 --> 00:04:04.576
And students are just less
inclined to go through all

00:04:04.576 --> 00:04:07.346
of that mental effort if they
don't have a compelling reason

00:04:07.346 --> 00:04:07.816
to do so.

00:04:08.266 --> 00:04:10.806
So I do notice that these very
effective teachers are creating

00:04:10.806 --> 00:04:12.746
these really compelling
reasons for students

00:04:12.746 --> 00:04:14.366
to be comprehending
in the first place.

00:04:14.676 --> 00:04:16.696
The students work harder,
they exert more effort,

00:04:16.696 --> 00:04:18.716
and it really shows in their
comprehension development.

00:04:18.716 --> 00:04:20.656
One of the things that
I sometimes see is

00:04:20.656 --> 00:04:22.926
that teachers will lose
sight of the purpose

00:04:22.926 --> 00:04:24.186
of comprehension strategies.

00:04:24.536 --> 00:04:25.786
The purpose of them is simply

00:04:25.786 --> 00:04:27.986
to help us understand
better when we read.

00:04:28.256 --> 00:04:29.726
We don't want strategies
to get to the point

00:04:29.726 --> 00:04:31.366
where they're taking
on a life of their own.

00:04:31.436 --> 00:04:33.756
So to take a concrete
example, some teachers,

00:04:33.756 --> 00:04:35.436
when they are teaching
visualization,

00:04:35.576 --> 00:04:38.406
will have students fill out a
little worksheet as they read

00:04:38.456 --> 00:04:42.176
that says, "What did you see in
your mind as you were reading?

00:04:42.366 --> 00:04:43.356
What did you hear?

00:04:43.356 --> 00:04:44.196
What did you touch?

00:04:44.196 --> 00:04:44.956
What did you taste?

00:04:44.956 --> 00:04:45.836
What did you smell?"

00:04:45.936 --> 00:04:48.956
And to me, that gets too
far away from what we know

00:04:48.956 --> 00:04:50.556
about what good readers
do when they read.

00:04:50.556 --> 00:04:53.906
Because when we read, very often
we aren't smelling anything

00:04:53.996 --> 00:04:55.736
in the story, or
we're not touching

00:04:55.736 --> 00:04:57.786
or hearing anything
in the story.

00:04:58.016 --> 00:05:01.256
We're usually seeing something,
but even not always that.

00:05:01.576 --> 00:05:03.696
And we don't want students
to get to the point

00:05:03.696 --> 00:05:05.746
where they're just trying
to apply these strategies

00:05:05.746 --> 00:05:07.206
or just trying to
smell something,

00:05:07.206 --> 00:05:09.366
so to speak, for the worksheet.

00:05:09.716 --> 00:05:11.986
We want to them to be applying
them only to the degree

00:05:11.986 --> 00:05:14.336
that they really help support
their reading comprehension.

00:05:14.686 --> 00:05:17.596
So that's one of the mistakes I
see, and teachers can get away

00:05:17.976 --> 00:05:20.036
from that mistake
or that challenge

00:05:20.166 --> 00:05:22.516
by just constantly asking
themselves, "What do I do

00:05:22.516 --> 00:05:23.836
as a good reader when I read?

00:05:23.986 --> 00:05:26.176
What do I know about what good
readers do when they read?"

00:05:26.176 --> 00:05:30.446
and try to keep students' own
activities and their own actions

00:05:30.446 --> 00:05:33.636
in their mind's eye
focused on that goal.

00:05:33.966 --> 00:05:36.316
And I would add that
patience is really important.

00:05:36.316 --> 00:05:37.816
We have some research to suggest

00:05:37.816 --> 00:05:39.366
that it takes teachers
several years

00:05:39.366 --> 00:05:41.316
to become really good reading
comprehension teachers.

00:05:41.316 --> 00:05:43.326
It's much more difficult
than teaching some

00:05:43.326 --> 00:05:44.756
of the lower-level skills.

00:05:44.756 --> 00:05:48.496
And as a result, teachers just
need time to become very good

00:05:48.496 --> 00:05:50.376
at this and sort of be
patient with the fact

00:05:50.376 --> 00:05:53.976
that this is really difficult
work that they are trying to do.

00:05:54.508 --> 00:05:57.508
[Music]