WEBVTT

00:00:00.516 --> 00:00:04.546
[Music]

00:00:05.046 --> 00:00:06.866
I'm Tom Carpenter.

00:00:07.186 --> 00:00:10.666
I'm an emeritus professor at the
University of Wisconsin-Madison

00:00:11.156 --> 00:00:13.016
and a researcher at
the Wisconsin Center

00:00:13.016 --> 00:00:14.496
for Education Research.

00:00:15.116 --> 00:00:17.996
I was a member of the What
Works Clearinghouse panel

00:00:17.996 --> 00:00:21.046
that produced the report
Developing Effective

00:00:21.046 --> 00:00:22.106
Fraction Instruction.

00:00:22.516 --> 00:00:25.626
I'm going to talk about
the first recommendation

00:00:25.626 --> 00:00:28.366
in the report, which is to
build upon children's intuitive

00:00:28.366 --> 00:00:31.806
knowledge of sharing to
develop fraction concepts.

00:00:32.136 --> 00:00:34.186
The overarching theme
of the report is

00:00:34.186 --> 00:00:36.046
that effective instruction
is grounded

00:00:36.046 --> 00:00:37.446
in developing understanding.

00:00:37.826 --> 00:00:40.366
The defining feature of
learning with understanding is

00:00:40.366 --> 00:00:41.526
that knowledge is connected.

00:00:42.396 --> 00:00:45.226
In particular, it's important
that knowledge is connected

00:00:45.316 --> 00:00:47.356
to the things that
children already understand.

00:00:47.696 --> 00:00:50.786
Young children have a lot
of intuitive knowledge

00:00:50.786 --> 00:00:54.566
about sharing situations
and can solve problems

00:00:54.566 --> 00:00:55.596
involving sharing.

00:00:55.706 --> 00:00:58.306
And these sharing
problems can be used then

00:00:58.306 --> 00:01:00.686
to develop basic
fraction concepts.

00:01:01.126 --> 00:01:03.356
We usually start,
essentially, with division.

00:01:04.426 --> 00:01:05.105
Children as young

00:01:05.105 --> 00:01:09.736
as kindergarten can solve
division problems involving

00:01:09.736 --> 00:01:11.176
sharing that will
ultimately lead

00:01:11.176 --> 00:01:13.496
up to developing fraction ideas.

00:01:14.206 --> 00:01:18.356
For example, you might
pose the following problem

00:01:18.356 --> 00:01:21.606
to young children: "I
just baked 12 cupcakes,

00:01:21.606 --> 00:01:24.146
and I want to put
them on three plates.

00:01:24.656 --> 00:01:27.536
How many cupcakes would
be on each plate?"

00:01:28.186 --> 00:01:31.706
So children might solve
that problem by starting out

00:01:31.706 --> 00:01:34.356
and counting out
counters of some kind

00:01:34.356 --> 00:01:36.006
to represent the 12 cupcakes.

00:01:36.716 --> 00:01:40.146
Children might draw some
representation of the plates

00:01:40.146 --> 00:01:42.416
or they might use some other
way of representing the plates,

00:01:42.466 --> 00:01:45.566
but very commonly they'll
draw plates like that.

00:01:45.566 --> 00:01:47.676
And then they will
essentially say, "Well,

00:01:47.676 --> 00:01:49.666
we've got to have the
same number on each plate,

00:01:49.666 --> 00:01:55.696
so I will deal the counters
to the plate, one at a time."

00:01:56.876 --> 00:01:58.846
And then they would count
the number of cupcakes

00:01:58.846 --> 00:02:01.716
on each plate-one, two, three,
four; one, two, three, four;

00:02:01.716 --> 00:02:03.906
one, two, three,
four-probably count them all.

00:02:03.906 --> 00:02:06.206
They could just count one plate,
since they're all the same,

00:02:06.206 --> 00:02:07.696
but they'll count them all.

00:02:09.045 --> 00:02:10.326
So they start with
problems like that,

00:02:10.476 --> 00:02:13.396
and that's a basic division
problem that children

00:02:13.396 --> 00:02:14.746
in kindergarten can solve.

00:02:15.216 --> 00:02:17.996
They don't solve that because
they have been shown how

00:02:17.996 --> 00:02:20.256
to solve them; these are
sort of intuitive solutions.

00:02:20.256 --> 00:02:23.436
And it's really much more
effective to pose the problems

00:02:23.436 --> 00:02:24.906
to the children and
let them come

00:02:24.906 --> 00:02:28.336
up with their specific
ways of solving them.

00:02:28.336 --> 00:02:32.746
After children have had some
experience partitioning sets

00:02:32.746 --> 00:02:37.766
that can be partitioned
exactly, then we pose a problem

00:02:37.766 --> 00:02:41.276
to them like, "We have
two children sharing

00:02:41.326 --> 00:02:42.236
three cupcakes."

00:02:42.896 --> 00:02:45.196
Now you can't give
all the cupcake;

00:02:45.196 --> 00:02:47.356
you can't take the
three cupcakes

00:02:47.356 --> 00:02:49.336
and put them into even piles.

00:02:49.336 --> 00:02:52.226
Children have to figure out what
to do with the leftover cupcake.

00:02:52.386 --> 00:02:56.486
A solution that the child
herself drew-this is a

00:02:56.486 --> 00:02:59.946
first-grade child-drew the two
people sharing the cupcakes,

00:02:59.946 --> 00:03:04.396
drew the three cupcakes,
and then gave one cupcake

00:03:04.396 --> 00:03:09.566
to each child, and then divided
the remaining cupcake in half.

00:03:11.876 --> 00:03:13.706
The notion of halving
can be used

00:03:13.706 --> 00:03:16.136
to solve quite a few
problems, like we've just seen,

00:03:16.546 --> 00:03:18.296
but it's somewhat
limited in terms

00:03:18.296 --> 00:03:20.036
of developing fraction concepts.

00:03:20.416 --> 00:03:23.556
So here's another example,
where three children were asked

00:03:23.996 --> 00:03:33.016
to share five cakes, and each
child was given one cake.

00:03:33.556 --> 00:03:36.416
The other two cakes
were cut in half,

00:03:36.976 --> 00:03:38.796
so each child could
get another half.

00:03:39.476 --> 00:03:42.456
But this particular child-a
first grader-didn't know what

00:03:42.456 --> 00:03:44.176
to do with the remaining part.

00:03:44.256 --> 00:03:47.106
The remaining part, he would
give that to the teacher

00:03:47.106 --> 00:03:49.046
or give that to someone else.

00:03:49.156 --> 00:03:51.226
One of the things children
need to get is some sort

00:03:51.226 --> 00:03:56.326
of an anticipatory notion-to
anticipate how many pieces

00:03:56.326 --> 00:03:59.266
they're going to cut it into
and sort of start out thinking

00:03:59.266 --> 00:04:02.216
about the number of pieces
that they want to get.

00:04:02.926 --> 00:04:04.396
One of the central ideas

00:04:04.396 --> 00:04:07.026
in understanding fractions
is the notion of equivalence.

00:04:07.656 --> 00:04:10.206
Equivalence underlies
most of the operations

00:04:10.206 --> 00:04:11.616
that you do with fractions.

00:04:11.976 --> 00:04:15.556
If you really understand
equivalence, then adding

00:04:15.556 --> 00:04:19.016
and subtracting fractions
becomes fairly straightforward.

00:04:19.486 --> 00:04:23.166
In this example, we have eight
children sharing five pancakes.

00:04:23.586 --> 00:04:29.456
And one child did it by
cutting each of the pancakes

00:04:29.456 --> 00:04:33.476
up into eight pieces, and so
each child got five-eighths.

00:04:33.666 --> 00:04:38.176
In the other example, another
child cut each of the pancakes

00:04:38.176 --> 00:04:41.536
into halves, and each
child got a half.

00:04:41.596 --> 00:04:44.336
But then there was one
pancake that needed to be cut

00:04:44.336 --> 00:04:47.636
up some more, and so the
child cut it up into halves

00:04:47.636 --> 00:04:49.746
of the halves, and halves
of the halves again,

00:04:49.746 --> 00:04:52.586
so there were eight pieces,
and wound up with the solution

00:04:52.586 --> 00:04:54.356
of one-half plus one-eighth.

00:04:55.036 --> 00:04:58.206
And so there the issue
then became who gets more,

00:04:58.286 --> 00:05:00.826
the child who got
five-eighths or the child

00:05:00.826 --> 00:05:02.746
who got one-half
plus one-eighth?

00:05:03.126 --> 00:05:05.406
What's the relationship
between one-half

00:05:05.756 --> 00:05:08.076
and the four-eighths
that are compared?

00:05:08.076 --> 00:05:09.976
So again, you're comparing
equivalent fractions.

00:05:11.516 --> 00:05:13.676
[Sharing and Equivalencies]

00:05:14.176 --> 00:05:16.626
Sharing can also be
used with older children

00:05:16.626 --> 00:05:19.036
to further develop the
idea of equivalence.

00:05:19.506 --> 00:05:22.296
Older children won't
necessarily draw pictures

00:05:22.556 --> 00:05:23.746
to represent the problems;

00:05:23.776 --> 00:05:26.786
they can use numerical
representation of the problems.

00:05:27.286 --> 00:05:29.416
Here is a representation
that was developed

00:05:29.456 --> 00:05:32.266
by a Dutch researcher by
the name of Leen Streefland

00:05:32.756 --> 00:05:38.776
for a problem he posed of 24
children going to a pizza parlor

00:05:38.776 --> 00:05:41.126
and ordering 16 pizzas.

00:05:42.486 --> 00:05:45.896
So the question is, "How
can these children sit

00:05:45.896 --> 00:05:47.316
at different table arrangements

00:05:47.316 --> 00:05:49.486
so that they all get the
same amount of pizza?"

00:05:50.056 --> 00:05:53.566
So one possibility is that
24 children sit at one table

00:05:53.566 --> 00:05:55.306
and share the 16 pizzas.

00:05:55.956 --> 00:05:59.926
But another possibility is that
we divide the table down so

00:05:59.926 --> 00:06:02.206
that we have two
tables of 12 children

00:06:02.786 --> 00:06:04.696
with eight pizzas on each table.

00:06:05.246 --> 00:06:08.966
Or we can divide those
tables down further

00:06:08.966 --> 00:06:12.716
so that six children are sharing
four pizzas, and ultimately

00:06:12.716 --> 00:06:14.866
that three children
are sharing two pizzas.

00:06:15.356 --> 00:06:18.096
Each of these situations are
essentially representations

00:06:18.096 --> 00:06:20.156
of equivalent fractions
and linked

00:06:20.156 --> 00:06:21.586
into the ideas of sharing.

00:06:21.736 --> 00:06:24.666
What we see in these examples
are children solving problems

00:06:24.666 --> 00:06:25.976
in ways that make sense to them.

00:06:26.476 --> 00:06:28.476
They have some intuitive
knowledge of sharing.

00:06:28.536 --> 00:06:31.646
And the teacher has posed
fraction problems in terms

00:06:31.646 --> 00:06:34.916
of sharing situations that the
children are allowed to solve

00:06:34.916 --> 00:06:37.646
in ways that they
devise for themselves.

00:06:37.966 --> 00:06:40.166
You pose the problems
and get out of the way

00:06:40.166 --> 00:06:42.956
and let the children solve
them and build on the knowledge

00:06:42.956 --> 00:06:43.966
that they bring to instruction.

00:06:45.516 --> 00:06:49.500
[Music]