WEBVTT

00:00:10.136 --> 00:00:12.016
My name is Wilfried Schmid.

00:00:12.426 --> 00:00:15.236
I am Professor of Mathematics at Harvard University.

00:00:15.506 --> 00:00:19.356
I was a member of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel.

00:00:20.306 --> 00:00:27.226
The panel did some of its work as a whole and some in five task groups and three committees.

00:00:27.776 --> 00:00:33.096
I was a member of two of the task groups: on critical knowledge and skills

00:00:33.566 --> 00:00:35.036
and the task group on assessment.

00:00:35.706 --> 00:00:42.026
Algebra is really the gateway to mathematics, to engineering, to science in college.

00:00:42.606 --> 00:00:47.496
And not surprisingly, there are a number of studies that show a very high correlation

00:00:47.496 --> 00:00:52.566
between success in algebra in high school and graduation from four-year colleges.

00:00:53.316 --> 00:00:57.996
The subject matter of Algebra I is important for technical careers,

00:00:58.466 --> 00:01:01.656
even careers that don't require a college education.

00:01:02.036 --> 00:01:09.656
For students who expect to go to college to major in science, including biological science

00:01:09.656 --> 00:01:16.256
and social science, or in engineering or who expect to go on to a professional school,

00:01:16.576 --> 00:01:19.156
well they certainly also need Algebra II.

00:01:19.316 --> 00:01:23.886
The panel was asked to make recommendations, based on the best available evidence,

00:01:24.426 --> 00:01:28.826
on the skills and skill progressions necessary for success in algebra.

00:01:29.786 --> 00:01:35.076
To do that, one, of course, has to have clarity on what algebra actually is.

00:01:35.506 --> 00:01:41.396
Three of the members of the panel, including myself, are university mathematicians, so we used,

00:01:41.556 --> 00:01:43.646
first of all, our professional judgment.

00:01:44.706 --> 00:01:51.556
We also examined the state standards of all 50 states-the technical term for these documents is

00:01:51.556 --> 00:01:56.396
"curriculum frameworks," and we looked at the curriculum guidelines

00:01:56.396 --> 00:02:02.346
of the high performing countries, such as Japan, South Korea, Singapore.

00:02:03.376 --> 00:02:09.616
Now, there are some controversies in mathematics education, but the nature of algebra is not.

00:02:10.276 --> 00:02:15.096
There seems to be a high degree of consensus of the major topics of algebra.

00:02:15.636 --> 00:02:22.486
The panel gives a list of six major topics, which cover Algebra I, Algebra II,

00:02:23.216 --> 00:02:28.366
and depending on how the curriculum is organized also part of Pre-Calculus.

00:02:28.856 --> 00:02:37.976
The major topics are: symbols and expressions, linear equations, quadratic equations, functions,

00:02:38.846 --> 00:02:43.956
the algebra of polynomials, and combinatorics and finite probability.

00:02:44.846 --> 00:02:49.036
The first five topics really constitute the essence of algebra,

00:02:49.526 --> 00:02:51.306
and they are all equally important.

00:02:51.946 --> 00:02:55.786
The last topic, combinatorics and finite probability,

00:02:56.306 --> 00:02:58.966
is really an application of the binomial theorem.

00:02:59.906 --> 00:03:05.296
A very important application to be sure, but not really basic algebra.

00:03:06.366 --> 00:03:11.216
In all cases, it is not just the skills and concepts that should be taught,

00:03:11.756 --> 00:03:15.246
but also the way these are used in solving problems.

00:03:16.286 --> 00:03:23.146
Algebra involves three main circles of ideas; symbolic computation, the notion of function,

00:03:23.976 --> 00:03:29.306
and the process of translating problems into equations that then can be solved.

00:03:29.756 --> 00:03:36.036
Our list of major topics of algebra is an elaboration of these circles of ideas.

00:03:36.816 --> 00:03:44.216
The idea that one can compute with symbols as if they were numbers-provided one uses the rules

00:03:44.216 --> 00:03:49.846
that apply to computations with numbers-is absolutely crucial to algebra

00:03:50.146 --> 00:03:52.716
and all the mathematics that comes after algebra.

00:03:53.626 --> 00:03:57.576
The idea of function is related to symbolic computation.

00:03:58.476 --> 00:04:01.656
Let's imagine somebody standing on the top of a tall building

00:04:02.126 --> 00:04:04.646
and throwing a stone so it can fall freely.

00:04:04.936 --> 00:04:12.366
From basic physics or from observations that have been made, one knows that after one second,

00:04:13.086 --> 00:04:18.216
the stone has fallen approximately 16 feet; after two seconds,

00:04:18.846 --> 00:04:23.796
64 feet; after three seconds, 144 feet.

00:04:25.086 --> 00:04:30.356
Now, one can make a list of how far the stone falls after various time intervals.

00:04:30.896 --> 00:04:33.366
But the far more efficient way is to say

00:04:33.656 --> 00:04:40.476
that the stone falls 16t squared feet when t is measured in seconds.

00:04:41.106 --> 00:04:46.906
And it's important to realize that t does not have to be an integer, it can be any real number.

00:04:47.436 --> 00:04:50.716
How long will it take the stone to hit the ground?

00:04:50.996 --> 00:04:53.106
Well, that depends of course on the height of the building.

00:04:54.056 --> 00:04:58.876
Let's say the height of the building is h measured in feet.

00:05:00.046 --> 00:05:08.846
Then, the amount of time, t, it takes to hit the ground satisfies the equation 16t squared =h.

00:05:09.586 --> 00:05:14.976
And that can be solved for t. This is a very simple example, of course,

00:05:15.686 --> 00:05:19.206
but the process of translating the problem into an equation

00:05:19.206 --> 00:05:24.186
that can be solved is entirely typical for applications of algebra.

00:05:24.906 --> 00:05:30.266
Is a traditional single subject approach more effective than an integrated approach?

00:05:31.106 --> 00:05:34.346
Well, in the abstract, this question is almost impossible

00:05:34.346 --> 00:05:36.866
to answer based on really solid evidence.

00:05:37.896 --> 00:05:43.916
High quality studies really do not look at the two approaches in general.

00:05:43.986 --> 00:05:48.626
They may compare individual curricula but not the approaches in general.

00:05:49.656 --> 00:05:54.186
What is important is that in either approach,

00:05:54.736 --> 00:06:02.446
the subject be presented coherently in a logical sequence and that enough attention is paid

00:06:02.446 --> 00:06:04.686
to the connections between various subjects.

00:06:05.536 --> 00:06:10.686
Symbols and expressions and linear equations are definitely Algebra I subjects.

00:06:11.306 --> 00:06:15.756
At the other end, complex numbers, the fundamental theorem of algebra,

00:06:16.266 --> 00:06:21.236
the binomial theorem and its applications are sometimes taught in Pre-Calculus.

00:06:21.886 --> 00:06:25.686
Everything in between belongs to Algebra II.

00:06:25.686 --> 00:06:31.786
For an integrated sequence, the grade level at which various topics are taught depends very much

00:06:31.786 --> 00:06:38.076
on how the curriculum is organized, how geometry topics and algebra topics are intertwined.

00:06:38.986 --> 00:06:45.866
But the sequence must be organized logically, and all of these topics are to be covered

00:06:45.866 --> 00:06:48.656
by the end of eleventh grade or the beginning of twelfth grade.

00:06:49.436 --> 00:06:55.456
Serving on the National Mathematics Panel was a really interesting experience and I hope,

00:06:55.456 --> 00:06:58.116
as I am sure all of my colleagues on the panel do,

00:06:58.716 --> 00:07:01.706
that our recommendations can make a real difference

00:07:01.706 --> 00:07:03.906
to how Mathematics is taught in this country.