WEBVTT

00:00:11.046 --> 00:00:15.986
I am Bonnie Grossen, Executive Director for the Center for Applied Research in Education,

00:00:16.296 --> 00:00:20.696
also known as CARE, and CARE is affiliated with University of Oregon.

00:00:20.956 --> 00:00:25.576
In weaving together basic skills with algebraic concepts,

00:00:26.076 --> 00:00:32.286
there are some important instructional principles that kind of help guide that process.

00:00:33.506 --> 00:00:41.156
And one is that you don't have to have the same topic occur for the whole lesson.

00:00:41.156 --> 00:00:47.066
It's good to have some tracks so that you might have 10 or 15 minute segments

00:00:47.066 --> 00:00:49.646
where you are working on something you began yesterday.

00:00:49.646 --> 00:00:52.956
For example, well, students who don't know their math facts,

00:00:52.956 --> 00:00:54.746
you don't want to do a whole period on math facts.

00:00:54.746 --> 00:00:58.166
You might do three minutes of a review of multiplication facts.

00:00:58.586 --> 00:01:04.516
Have another little track that is developing an algebraic concept,

00:01:04.516 --> 00:01:09.206
like maybe an algorithm for finding an unknown in a certain position.

00:01:10.706 --> 00:01:16.246
And then as they're learning some of the basic skills,

00:01:16.246 --> 00:01:19.986
you don't want to have the conceptual problems require skills they haven't learned

00:01:19.986 --> 00:01:25.316
because the success is an important part of making them willing to put out the effort.

00:01:25.316 --> 00:01:28.406
As they feel successful, then they put out a lot more effort,

00:01:28.406 --> 00:01:30.406
and everything starts to work together.

00:01:31.016 --> 00:01:37.226
So the curriculum has to be extremely well organized and review built in.

00:01:37.976 --> 00:01:41.516
Review should be massed initially.

00:01:41.876 --> 00:01:44.186
When students are learning a concept,

00:01:44.186 --> 00:01:50.066
they should have enough practice so that they actually can do the algorithm or do the procedure.

00:01:50.546 --> 00:01:54.216
Then after that, the review should be distributed.

00:01:54.426 --> 00:01:57.376
We find that distributed practice leads to retention,

00:01:58.146 --> 00:02:03.966
and that means just a few problems everyday, not a whole page of one type.

00:02:03.966 --> 00:02:08.166
And then it should be cumulative; the different things students have learned

00:02:08.166 --> 00:02:12.406
in the past should be reviewed in this distributed practice.

00:02:12.606 --> 00:02:18.226
And the practice shouldn't take up the whole period.

00:02:18.226 --> 00:02:21.676
It should be another one of those little segments in the instruction.

00:02:21.966 --> 00:02:27.836
One of the issues we have in math education, and all education as a matter of fact,

00:02:27.836 --> 00:02:31.536
is when to use student-centered, or small group,

00:02:31.536 --> 00:02:36.836
instruction and when to have teacher-centered, or explicit, instruction.

00:02:37.466 --> 00:02:41.006
And one thing is quite clear; explicit instruction is more democratic

00:02:41.666 --> 00:02:44.706
than student-centered discovery groups.

00:02:45.236 --> 00:02:53.646
When students have to figure out the concept without any initial presentation from the teacher,

00:02:53.646 --> 00:02:57.206
then some students get the concept and others don't.

00:02:57.206 --> 00:02:59.136
And even if the teachers comes in and ask questions,

00:02:59.136 --> 00:03:02.426
it's hard for the teacher to respond to the kids who are not getting it

00:03:02.426 --> 00:03:03.986
when there are some that are getting it.

00:03:03.986 --> 00:03:08.606
And it just ends up being a focus on those who are getting it and the teacher feeling

00:03:08.606 --> 00:03:13.186
like the class got it when actually there is a large number of them who are still confused.

00:03:13.646 --> 00:03:17.886
So, the most democratic method for initial presentation is,

00:03:18.086 --> 00:03:20.596
we say, make the strategy conspicuous.

00:03:21.186 --> 00:03:22.916
And that can be explicit.

00:03:22.916 --> 00:03:24.796
That can be the teacher illustrating on the board,

00:03:24.796 --> 00:03:29.526
but there are other ways also to make math strategies conspicuous.

00:03:30.206 --> 00:03:38.016
The appropriate place for students to do group work is in applications

00:03:38.016 --> 00:03:41.196
or in making the review more interesting.

00:03:41.686 --> 00:03:45.916
Structured activities where the students work together to monitor each other's practice

00:03:45.916 --> 00:03:52.636
and have little challenges, and that makes the review and practice interesting.

00:03:53.326 --> 00:03:57.106
And then having students work together in groups

00:03:57.106 --> 00:04:01.126
where they're applying the concepts they learned to maybe more complex applications

00:04:01.126 --> 00:04:03.616
where they can put their heads together to figure

00:04:03.616 --> 00:04:07.936
out how the things they've learned might apply to this new situation.

00:04:08.326 --> 00:04:12.616
A real important tactic for teachers to use is scaffolding,

00:04:13.746 --> 00:04:18.065
and however strategies are made conspicuous,

00:04:18.216 --> 00:04:25.066
the students may often need continuous scaffolding or some guided prompting.

00:04:25.366 --> 00:04:31.346
So if teachers are completely involved with students while they're working,

00:04:31.426 --> 00:04:35.796
after they have finished working, looking at their work all the time and responding to that,

00:04:35.796 --> 00:04:37.876
they're doing a kind of formative assessment.

00:04:37.946 --> 00:04:42.036
One of the things we've done with students who are weak with their multiplication facts,

00:04:42.286 --> 00:04:48.936
we've put little tables in the back of their book that they could refer to that have the factors

00:04:48.936 --> 00:04:53.326
across the top and bottom and the multiples in a little grid sheet,

00:04:54.036 --> 00:04:55.776
rather than giving them calculators.

00:04:56.006 --> 00:04:58.326
Calculators are more opaque.

00:04:58.596 --> 00:05:02.416
One of the things that's become very popular in high schools is,

00:05:03.416 --> 00:05:06.006
for students who are not quite ready for algebra,

00:05:06.286 --> 00:05:10.716
the school will take the regular algebra course that's taught over a year

00:05:11.336 --> 00:05:14.596
and divide it into four pieces and take the first piece,

00:05:14.596 --> 00:05:19.536
the first quarter and then teach it in a full semester to students who are behind

00:05:20.216 --> 00:05:23.386
and thereby taking two years to get through algebra.

00:05:25.026 --> 00:05:30.186
Now when you do that, you don't have anything engineered into that textbook

00:05:30.186 --> 00:05:33.876
that helps the teacher teach those missing basic skills.

00:05:33.876 --> 00:05:37.306
You're just going more slowly through the same algebra course.

00:05:38.696 --> 00:05:42.826
And we have found that if you really spend sometime engineering the instruction,

00:05:42.826 --> 00:05:52.116
planning the examples, and building in some of that pre-skill instruction into the textbook,

00:05:52.116 --> 00:05:53.866
it can be very helpful for the teacher.

00:05:54.346 --> 00:05:58.946
A well-engineered text is going to help the teacher make progress more efficiently

00:05:58.946 --> 00:06:00.566
and effectively.

00:06:00.566 --> 00:06:04.366
High schools need to provide, for students who don't have the pre-skills for algebra,

00:06:04.776 --> 00:06:08.326
a course that's designed specifically for them,

00:06:08.636 --> 00:06:13.956
that is engineered to teach the pre-skills they are missing, the concepts of proportions

00:06:13.956 --> 00:06:18.186
and ratios and the relationship between decimals, fractions, and percents.

00:06:18.186 --> 00:06:23.066
Those kinds of things are built-in as they are being led into algebra,

00:06:23.316 --> 00:06:27.826
rather than just taking the standard algebra course and dividing it into chunks

00:06:27.826 --> 00:06:30.456
and taking two years to teach that same content.

00:06:30.456 --> 00:06:37.116
There has to be a smarter design to the curriculum to catch those kids up, and it can be done.

00:06:37.116 --> 00:06:38.426
We know it can be done.